Part I of this series (029) laid out some pervasive problems with law firm panel arrangements, and Part II (030) outlined the basics of how we believe those problems can be overcome through correct structure and active management. This final installment will go deeper into what we believe are the most
Dan Currell
Part II on Convergence: How to Make it Work (030)
By Dan Currell on
Posted in In-House Legal Departments, Legal Innovation
In the first part of this series (Post 029), we discussed why there are sometimes serious problems with the way law firm preferred provider panels are structured and managed. In particular, we often see that law firm panels:
- Take clients “up-market”, raising rather than lowering their legal fees;
- Reduce firms’ responsiveness, because larger
…
Part I on Convergence: Why Practice Falls Short of Theory (029)
By Dan Currell on
Posted in In-House Legal Departments, Legal Innovation
We see many companies these days running law firm convergence exercises – generally resulting in a preferred law firm network with fewer “approved” firms than the company previously used. The goal of this exercise is usually to reduce total legal spending and simplify outside counsel management. This kind of effort has a long track record…
